The U.S. Supreme Court just launched a constitutional crisis– www.americanthinker.com

The Supreme Court failed to affirm the president’s recent executive order protecting election integrity by voter ID and eligibility.

The details of the Court’s judicial reasoning is full of granular reference made ultimately to various federally derived postal rules which are not relevant to the larger national security implications of the EO.

Unfortunately the Court failed to anchor its attention fully to the one document that mattered: the larger U.S. Constitution.

The Court, yet again, can’t see the forest from the trees, and worse, got caught up in analyzing the tree bark.  Like a pilot in a spin, it is suffering from spatial disorientation, and has judicially crashed.

Apparently the SCOTUS believed the question before them involved the post office.

Their attention was captured by the concept of postal delay: that the president’s EO would retard mail ballot processing with rules designed to actually protect it.  Their perception of time overruled the necessity of security. They fell for the legal subterfuge of the DNC, and lost their constitutional compass. The Court buried itself in minute legalism, rather than actual national justice.

The Court is otherwise so used to picking winners and losers in traditional litigation, that it forgot that the Constitution can be a different national duty. A constitutional fight can sometimes create a zero-sum result: everyone loses if the nation is splintered by political tribalism.  Unity is the constitutional cause, and no one wins when a constitutional election system is seen as a dispute instead of a joint responsibility.